Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Cascade County, Montana, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 270
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Cascade County, Montana totaled $2,773,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Walter Gruel & Son Inc | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $134,142 |
2 | Sieben Livestock Co | Helena, MT 59624 | $125,000 |
3 | Michael A Gannon | Cascade, MT 59421 | $100,712 |
4 | Troy Eugene Johnson | Sand Coulee, MT 59472 | $91,599 |
5 | Lane Ranch Cascade | Cascade, MT 59421 | $87,260 |
6 | Michael E O'neill | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $84,657 |
7 | Fairhaven Colony Inc | Ulm, MT 59485 | $72,436 |
8 | Greg A Preble | Cascade, MT 59421 | $71,428 |
9 | Keaster Land & Livestock Inc | Belt, MT 59412 | $68,416 |
10 | Norman J Lorang | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $64,829 |
11 | Mccafferty Ranch Company LLC | Belt, MT 59412 | $56,901 |
12 | Cascade Colony Inc | Sun River, MT 59483 | $55,147 |
13 | Little Belt Creek Ranch | Belt, MT 59412 | $39,004 |
14 | Lorang Land And Cattle Inc | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $36,581 |
15 | Hastings Ranch Inc | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $36,543 |
16 | Wade W Jacobsen | Sun River, MT 59483 | $36,458 |
17 | John C Mccafferty | Belt, MT 59412 | $35,628 |
18 | Dawson Ranch Inc | Belt, MT 59412 | $32,528 |
19 | Gollaher Ranch Co | Cascade, MT 59421 | $31,540 |
20 | Rumney Cattle Company | Cascade, MT 59421 | $30,567 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>