Market Gains in Cascade County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 81
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Cascade County, Montana totaled $404,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Otto E Johnson & Son Inc | Sand Coulee, MT 59472 | $1,946 |
42 | D & R Farms | Power, MT 59468 | $1,882 |
43 | Montana Prairie Nest | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $1,684 |
44 | Olson Orin & Lois | Cascade, MT 59421 | $1,680 |
45 | Steve J Yuhas | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $1,662 |
46 | James E Milos Sr | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $1,655 |
47 | James E Neumann | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $1,423 |
48 | Westport Farms | Floweree, MT 59440 | $1,341 |
49 | David Julius Somerfeld | Power, MT 59468 | $1,333 |
50 | Cummings Ranch | Cascade, MT 59421 | $1,319 |
51 | Dufresne Foundation | Great Falls, MT 59403 | $1,316 |
52 | Golie Farms | Floweree, MT 59440 | $1,256 |
53 | Olson Brothers | Great Falls, MT 59403 | $1,244 |
54 | Wood-chip LLC | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $1,022 |
55 | Helmut Neumann | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $792 |
56 | Thomas E Lorang | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $764 |
57 | Fasbender Farms Inc | Helena, MT 59601 | $675 |
58 | William & Charlotte Cummings | Cascade, MT 59421 | $649 |
59 | Hertha A Chamberlain | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $625 |
60 | Epic Partners | Sun River, MT 59483 | $608 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”