SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program in Cascade County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 164
Recipients of SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program from farms in Cascade County, Montana totaled $4,705,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Ronald & Debra Laubach | Power, MT 59468 | $207,825 |
2 | Hillcrest Colony Inc | Power, MT 59468 | $199,257 |
3 | Standley Brothers Partnership | Cascade, MT 59421 | $196,463 |
4 | Bumgarner Ranch | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $187,302 |
5 | Taft Land Partnership | Cascade, MT 59421 | $183,110 |
6 | Huber Ranch | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $181,516 |
7 | Somerfeld & Sons Land & Livestock | Power, MT 59468 | $179,654 |
8 | Big Stone Colony Inc | Sand Coulee, MT 59472 | $172,818 |
9 | Bowman Farms II | Belt, MT 59412 | $153,723 |
10 | Carl Robert Mehmke | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $148,388 |
11 | L Johnson Inc | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $130,208 |
12 | Mehmke Walter A & Robyn R | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $123,358 |
13 | Grass Land Colony Inc | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $122,961 |
14 | Sun River Farm Inc | Ulm, MT 59485 | $92,902 |
15 | D & R Farms | Power, MT 59468 | $89,340 |
16 | Ja LLC | Floweree, MT 59440 | $88,749 |
17 | Gettel Farms Inc | Power, MT 59468 | $85,406 |
18 | Brad K Myers | Floweree, MT 59440 | $81,498 |
19 | Montana Prairie Nest II | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $78,780 |
20 | Richard Albert Gannon | Lincoln, MT 59639 | $77,041 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>