Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Chouteau County, Montana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 231
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Chouteau County, Montana totaled $1,079,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | John Bold | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $11,461 |
22 | Kevin Kittredge | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $11,368 |
23 | Weaver Cattle Co | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $11,039 |
24 | Tjbj Ranch Co | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $10,310 |
25 | Shit Show Cattle Co LLC | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $9,818 |
26 | Elk Run Ranch | Highwood, MT 59450 | $9,569 |
27 | Outhouse Dot Ranch LLC | Shonkin, MT 59450 | $9,479 |
28 | Blair A Nack | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $9,327 |
29 | Rocky J Highfill | Shonkin, MT 59450 | $9,306 |
30 | Kalanick Ranch Inc | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $9,254 |
31 | Streit Livestock | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $9,102 |
32 | Roger Austin Genereux | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $8,866 |
33 | Shonkin Ranch LLC | Shonkin, MT 59450 | $8,838 |
34 | Michael D Pimperton | Carter, MT 59420 | $8,164 |
35 | Bower Ranch Inc | Highwood, MT 59450 | $8,134 |
36 | Bessette Ranch Co | Loma, MT 59460 | $7,823 |
37 | Weaver Land & Livestock Inc | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $7,768 |
38 | Shane Ophus | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $7,711 |
39 | Harris Land & Cattle | Highwood, MT 59450 | $7,581 |
40 | Robert Ebeling | Shonkin, MT 59450 | $7,573 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”