Farm Subsidy information
Chouteau County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Chouteau County, Montana, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 705
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Chouteau County, Montana totaled $41,693,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Bessette Ranch Co | Loma, MT 59460 | $197,009 |
22 | Derek Sande | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $196,032 |
23 | Bailey Land & Livestock Inc | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $188,767 |
24 | John Bold | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $187,865 |
25 | Lazy K6 Ranch Inc | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $181,147 |
26 | K E D Farms Inc | Loma, MT 59460 | $175,187 |
27 | Kgb Inc | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $174,713 |
28 | Kem & Terry Allen Partnership | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $173,130 |
29 | Streit Livestock | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $169,274 |
30 | Shonkin Creek Livestock | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $168,086 |
31 | Black Granary Farms LLC | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $164,852 |
32 | Shirley M Kralich | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $162,132 |
33 | Kraig C Meeks | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $161,837 |
34 | Schipf - Swan Ranch Inc | Highwood, MT 59450 | $158,948 |
35 | Weaver Cattle Co | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $153,120 |
36 | Jesco Agriculture Inc | Brady, MT 59416 | $151,517 |
37 | Wheatland Farms Inc | Highwood, MT 59450 | $151,151 |
38 | South Bench Farms LLC | Highwood, MT 59450 | $150,401 |
39 | Horel Farms Inc | Rudyard, MT 59540 | $149,203 |
40 | J & J Woodburn LLC | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $148,521 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”