Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Chouteau County, Montana, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 75
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Chouteau County, Montana totaled $334,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Virgelle Ventures Inc | Loma, MT 59460 | $4,420 |
22 | Morris H Sternberg | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $4,319 |
23 | Melanie A Schwarzbach | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $3,674 |
24 | Shaud Richard Schwarzbach | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $3,674 |
25 | Gasvoda & Sons Inc | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $3,193 |
26 | K Bar 3 Farms Inc | Fairfield, MT 59436 | $3,178 |
27 | Lawrence M Bold | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $3,021 |
28 | Duane C Ray | Bozeman, MT 59718 | $2,914 |
29 | John Bold | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $2,834 |
30 | Dept Of Natural Resources & Conservation Trust Lan | Helena, MT 59620 | $2,684 |
31 | Wayne C Bronec | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $2,656 |
32 | Marsha Horel | Rudyard, MT 59540 | $2,579 |
33 | Cm Farms Inc | Loma, MT 59460 | $2,396 |
34 | Meeks Farm | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $2,305 |
35 | Weston L Brown | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $2,191 |
36 | Ed Ventures Inc | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $1,904 |
37 | Dennis' Farm Inc | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $1,864 |
38 | Gasvoda Brothers Livestock LLC | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $1,574 |
39 | Dandi Acres | Loma, MT 59460 | $1,482 |
40 | Onstad Land Co Inc | Brady, MT 59416 | $1,423 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”