Conservation Reserve Program in Chouteau County, Montana, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 221
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Chouteau County, Montana totaled $1,976,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Keith Danreuther | Loma, MT 59460 | $23,874 |
22 | Patti Danreuther | Loma, MT 59460 | $23,874 |
23 | Henry A Nagamori Living Trust | Loma, MT 59460 | $22,920 |
24 | B & M Lund | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $22,776 |
25 | Dusty Allderdice | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $22,733 |
26 | Blanche J Engellant | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $22,620 |
27 | The Francis L Engellant Bypass Trust | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $22,620 |
28 | , | $21,847 | |
29 | Rustin L Genereux | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $21,650 |
30 | Box Canyon Ranch Inc | Hamilton, MT 59840 | $20,428 |
31 | , | $20,377 | |
32 | Beau A Pegar | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $20,340 |
33 | Lazy K6 Ranch Inc | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $19,965 |
34 | Gerald W Brewer | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $19,840 |
35 | Wigger Land Co | Floweree, MT 59440 | $19,640 |
36 | Danreuther Ranches | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $17,679 |
37 | Dana Darlington | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $17,470 |
38 | , | $16,210 | |
39 | Triple E Inc | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $16,205 |
40 | Kirk Reichelt | Carter, MT 59420 | $16,168 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”