Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Chouteau County, Montana, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 148
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Chouteau County, Montana totaled $2,267,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | R & R Bronec Grain & Cattle | Carter, MT 59420 | $28,204 |
22 | Boehm Land & Lvstk Inc | Rudyard, MT 59540 | $27,567 |
23 | Chauvet Cattle | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $27,262 |
24 | Blair A Nack | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $26,985 |
25 | Grant W Harrer | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $25,796 |
26 | Elk Run Ranch | Highwood, MT 59450 | $25,596 |
27 | Gerald W Brewer | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $24,746 |
28 | Lippert Grain & Cattle | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $23,993 |
29 | Shawn H Hilty | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $23,221 |
30 | Bower Ranch Inc | Highwood, MT 59450 | $22,310 |
31 | Bessette Ranch Co | Loma, MT 59460 | $22,099 |
32 | Four 0 Six Land & Cattle LLC | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $21,581 |
33 | Gasvoda & Sons Inc | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $19,428 |
34 | Christian H Moline | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $18,904 |
35 | Virgelle Valley Ranch Inc | Loma, MT 59460 | $18,671 |
36 | Lazy Yb Land & Cattle | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $18,274 |
37 | Reichelt Land & Cattle | Carter, MT 59420 | $16,939 |
38 | Teton Land Co | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $16,644 |
39 | Roger Austin Genereux | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $16,628 |
40 | Sheep Coulee Ranch Llp | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $16,266 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”