Total Emergency Relief Program in Chouteau County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 544
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in Chouteau County, Montana totaled $22,481,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Twin Hills Colony Inc | Carter, MT 59420 | $193,876 |
22 | Kgb Inc | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $192,102 |
23 | Kem & Terry Allen Partnership | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $173,130 |
24 | K E D Farms Inc | Loma, MT 59460 | $172,757 |
25 | Schuler Bros | Carter, MT 59420 | $172,367 |
26 | Bahnmiller Land Co | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $168,325 |
27 | Shonkin Creek Livestock | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $168,086 |
28 | Spring Coulee Ranch Inc | Highwood, MT 59450 | $164,469 |
29 | Bailey Land & Livestock Inc | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $163,914 |
30 | Bahn Inc | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $159,105 |
31 | South Bench Farms LLC | Highwood, MT 59450 | $157,769 |
32 | Streit Livestock | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $155,920 |
33 | Dennis' Farm Inc | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $154,630 |
34 | Jesco Agriculture Inc | Brady, MT 59416 | $152,722 |
35 | Williams Bros Ag | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $148,108 |
36 | Mark Reichelt | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $142,223 |
37 | Donald Gondeiro Jr | Highwood, MT 59450 | $141,541 |
38 | Vicki Gondeiro | Highwood, MT 59450 | $141,541 |
39 | Black Granary Farms LLC | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $140,166 |
40 | Black Coulee Farms Inc | Rudyard, MT 59540 | $139,275 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”