Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in Chouteau County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 385
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in Chouteau County, Montana totaled $2,616,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Gasvoda & Sons Inc | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $27,229 |
22 | Bailey Land & Livestock Inc | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $25,772 |
23 | Virgelle Valley Ranch Inc | Loma, MT 59460 | $25,645 |
24 | Nld Inc | Choteau, MT 59422 | $25,560 |
25 | Sheehy Ranch | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $25,399 |
26 | Schuler Lands Inc | Great Falls, MT 59401 | $24,655 |
27 | Brett Winderl | Shonkin, MT 59450 | $24,433 |
28 | Roger L Genereux | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $22,957 |
29 | Oscar - The Oscar & J Trunk | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $22,920 |
30 | Arnold Kotthoff Jr | Shonkin, MT 59450 | $22,119 |
31 | Christian H Moline | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $21,781 |
32 | Chauvet Ranch Co | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $21,218 |
33 | Andreasen Lenington Partnership | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $21,217 |
34 | Charles Tonne | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $20,673 |
35 | Outhouse Dot Ranch LLC | Shonkin, MT 59450 | $20,613 |
36 | Patrick G Bronec | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $20,374 |
37 | John Bold | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $20,324 |
38 | Abn Ranch Inc | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $20,166 |
39 | Todd D Witt | Carter, MT 59420 | $20,113 |
40 | K T B Ranch Inc | Highwood, MT 59450 | $19,592 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”