Market Gains in Chouteau County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 260
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Chouteau County, Montana totaled $1,417,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Malek Farms Partnership | Highwood, MT 59450 | $15,099 |
22 | Prairie Breezes Inc | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $14,278 |
23 | Michael D Schultz | Loma, MT 59460 | $14,172 |
24 | Little Farms Inc | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $13,756 |
25 | Goldy's Inc | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $13,380 |
26 | Gordon D Moes | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $13,214 |
27 | Eric James Anderson | Missoula, MT 59803 | $12,973 |
28 | Long's Farm And Seed Inc | Shonkin, MT 59450 | $12,393 |
29 | Geyer Farms Inc | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $11,929 |
30 | Upham Farm Inc | Loma, MT 59460 | $11,762 |
31 | Duvall Brothers | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $11,747 |
32 | M John Stoos | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $11,616 |
33 | Ritland Farms Inc | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $10,721 |
34 | Streit Livestock | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $10,410 |
35 | Michael A Goldhahn | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $10,185 |
36 | Maughan Farms Inc | Hysham, MT 59038 | $10,184 |
37 | Todd Z Dahl | Carter, MT 59420 | $10,078 |
38 | Graceville Partnership | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $10,055 |
39 | Courtnage Farms Inc | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $9,972 |
40 | Hugh E Cameron | Power, MT 59468 | $9,880 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”