Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Chouteau County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 234
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Chouteau County, Montana totaled $7,089,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Kalanick Ranch Inc | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $45,953 |
42 | Forder Land & Cattle Co | Highwood, MT 59450 | $45,672 |
43 | Lazy Yb Land & Cattle | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $45,018 |
44 | Gerald W Brewer | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $43,395 |
45 | Michael A Gondeiro | Belt, MT 59412 | $43,250 |
46 | Amy S Wortman | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $42,523 |
47 | Pw Ridge Farms Inc | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $42,428 |
48 | Jody Hansen Farm Inc | Rudyard, MT 59540 | $40,905 |
49 | Kelly Rutledge | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $39,648 |
50 | Todd Witt Farms Inc | Carter, MT 59420 | $39,556 |
51 | Teton Land Co | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $39,513 |
52 | Weston L Brown | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $38,880 |
53 | K & D Inc | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $37,972 |
54 | O'hara Land & Cattle | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $37,543 |
55 | N Hanging 5 Ranch | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $37,192 |
56 | Gale A Harlow | Geyser, MT 59447 | $36,967 |
57 | La Land & Livestock Inc | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $36,945 |
58 | Lawrence Jappe III | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $36,927 |
59 | Christian H Moline | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $36,653 |
60 | Evans Ranch LLC | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $36,512 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”