Farm Subsidy information
Chouteau County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Chouteau County, Montana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,055
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Chouteau County, Montana totaled $39,034,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | William L Brown | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $123,730 |
42 | Bessette Ranch Co | Loma, MT 59460 | $123,040 |
43 | Benjamin Ranch | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $120,198 |
44 | R T D Farm Inc | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $119,721 |
45 | D C Bahnmiller Farm Inc | Highwood, MT 59450 | $118,911 |
46 | Lippert Grain & Cattle | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $118,273 |
47 | Virgelle Ventures Inc | Loma, MT 59460 | $114,063 |
48 | Shonkin Creek Livestock | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $113,552 |
49 | Phil Tadej Ranch Co | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $113,357 |
50 | Hillview Farm Inc | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $112,298 |
51 | Ritland Farms Inc | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $111,762 |
52 | Danreuther Heritage Farms Inc | Loma, MT 59460 | $111,357 |
53 | Onstad Land Co Inc | Brady, MT 59416 | $110,635 |
54 | Flat Creek Inc | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $110,102 |
55 | Charlson Ranch Co | Carter, MT 59420 | $109,757 |
56 | Kgb Inc | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $109,668 |
57 | Meadow Lane Colony Inc | Loma, MT 59460 | $108,477 |
58 | Danreuther Ranches | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $105,762 |
59 | Williams Bros Ag | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $104,656 |
60 | Bailey Land & Livestock Inc | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $104,147 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”