Farm Subsidy information
Chouteau County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Chouteau County, Montana, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 705
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Chouteau County, Montana totaled $41,693,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | , | $145,220 | |
42 | Dennis' Farm Inc | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $144,782 |
43 | Bahnmiller Land Co | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $142,457 |
44 | Anderson Partnership | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $140,385 |
45 | Jody Hansen Farm Inc | Rudyard, MT 59540 | $140,163 |
46 | Juedeman & Co LLC | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $139,112 |
47 | Bahn Inc | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $138,884 |
48 | Williams Bros Ag | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $135,797 |
49 | Mark Reichelt | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $132,080 |
50 | Cj Farms Inc | Highwood, MT 59450 | $131,264 |
51 | Harris Land & Cattle | Highwood, MT 59450 | $130,761 |
52 | Charles Good Ranch Inc | Carter, MT 59420 | $125,000 |
53 | Black Coulee Farms Inc | Rudyard, MT 59540 | $124,945 |
54 | Donald Gondeiro Jr | Highwood, MT 59450 | $124,383 |
55 | Vicki Gondeiro | Highwood, MT 59450 | $124,383 |
56 | Sheehy Ranch LLC | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $122,795 |
57 | Tjbj Ranch Co | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $121,638 |
58 | Danreuther Ag Inc | Loma, MT 59460 | $116,677 |
59 | Spring Coulee Ranch Inc | Highwood, MT 59450 | $113,994 |
60 | Colter M Darlington | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $112,486 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”