Counter Cyclical Program in Chouteau County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,180
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Chouteau County, Montana totaled $2,419,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Ritland Farms Inc | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $10,214 |
42 | Golden Acres Farm Inc | Brady, MT 59416 | $9,703 |
43 | Floyd Danbrook | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $9,619 |
44 | Helen Danbrook | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $9,619 |
45 | Schuler Bros | Carter, MT 59420 | $9,592 |
46 | Sternberg Farms Inc | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $9,581 |
47 | Stone Farms Ltd | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $9,433 |
48 | Jesco Agriculture Inc | Brady, MT 59416 | $9,261 |
49 | Gray's Northview Farms Inc | Highwood, MT 59450 | $9,189 |
50 | Andreasen Lenington Partnership | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $9,180 |
51 | Hillview Farm Inc | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $9,177 |
52 | H & H Cropping Inc | Highwood, MT 59450 | $8,839 |
53 | Beirwagen Farms | Loma, MT 59460 | $8,815 |
54 | Donald H Frieling | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $8,572 |
55 | Rivi Acres | Carter, MT 59420 | $8,546 |
56 | Aznoe Agribiz Inc | Brady, MT 59416 | $8,516 |
57 | Russell E Shepherd | Highwood, MT 59450 | $8,465 |
58 | Molinario Export Co | Carter, MT 59420 | $8,437 |
59 | Crooked Furrow Inc | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $8,426 |
60 | Lefurgey Farms Inc | Loma, MT 59460 | $8,419 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”