Direct Payment Program in Chouteau County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,674
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Chouteau County, Montana totaled $105,011,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | David W Robinson | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $365,250 |
42 | Hcf P/s | Highwood, MT 59450 | $362,263 |
43 | Brent Macdonald Inc | Floweree, MT 59440 | $354,091 |
44 | Owen Farm Co | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $351,823 |
45 | Steve Witt | Loma, MT 59460 | $344,358 |
46 | C Worrall & Sons Inc | Loma, MT 59460 | $342,896 |
47 | Charlson Ranch Co | Carter, MT 59420 | $342,559 |
48 | H & H Cropping Inc | Highwood, MT 59450 | $340,281 |
49 | Boehm Land & Lvstk Inc | Rudyard, MT 59540 | $338,923 |
50 | Long's Farm And Seed Inc | Shonkin, MT 59450 | $331,486 |
51 | Jerry L Jensen | Loma, MT 59460 | $330,690 |
52 | Paul J & Jerri L Dostal Llp | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $330,556 |
53 | Missouri Breaks Ranch Inc | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $328,940 |
54 | D & W Farming Inc | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $328,157 |
55 | Christofferson Farms Inc | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $323,218 |
56 | S & L Agri Ranch Inc | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $323,102 |
57 | Virgelle Ventures Inc | Loma, MT 59460 | $322,266 |
58 | Crooked Furrow Inc | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $321,064 |
59 | Square Butte Farms Inc | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $320,475 |
60 | D J M Farms Inc | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $319,464 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”