Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Chouteau County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 817
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Chouteau County, Montana totaled $14,507,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Ritland Farms Inc | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $68,839 |
42 | Lazy Yb Land & Cattle | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $67,325 |
43 | Wheatland Farms Inc | Highwood, MT 59450 | $66,780 |
44 | Stewart Ranch Inc | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $66,736 |
45 | Onstad Farms Inc | Brady, MT 59416 | $66,384 |
46 | D & J Robertson Farms Inc | Loma, MT 59460 | $65,589 |
47 | Danreuther Ag Inc | Loma, MT 59460 | $65,271 |
48 | Gray's Northview Farms Inc | Highwood, MT 59450 | $64,846 |
49 | Evans Ranch LLC | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $64,698 |
50 | Horel Farms Inc | Rudyard, MT 59540 | $63,433 |
51 | Lippert Grain & Cattle | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $63,174 |
52 | Kgb Inc | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $62,900 |
53 | Steve Witt | Loma, MT 59460 | $62,157 |
54 | Dennis' Farm Inc | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $62,032 |
55 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $61,654 |
56 | R T D Farm Inc | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $61,486 |
57 | Stone Farms Ltd | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $61,217 |
58 | Streit Livestock | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $59,552 |
59 | Wharram Ranch Co Inc | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $59,256 |
60 | Flat Creek Inc | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $59,027 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”