Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Chouteau County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 76
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Chouteau County, Montana totaled $661,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Howard R Pirch | Denver, CO 80206 | $3,899 |
42 | Whitehorn Farms Inc | Floweree, MT 59440 | $3,642 |
43 | Karen C Lippert | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $3,593 |
44 | Leon Cline | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $3,592 |
45 | Bessette Ranch Co | Loma, MT 59460 | $3,500 |
46 | Z Y Brown Ranch Inc | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $3,500 |
47 | Adam R Cecrle | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $3,500 |
48 | Harrison O'connor | Geyser, MT 59447 | $3,500 |
49 | Fredrick W Finke | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $3,417 |
50 | N Hanging 5 Ranch | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $2,977 |
51 | Freida B Muir | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $2,925 |
52 | Diana Knudson | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $2,863 |
53 | Russ Knudson | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $2,861 |
54 | Betty Silvan | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $2,232 |
55 | Lost Lake Ranch | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $1,868 |
56 | Dennis J Cook | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $1,736 |
57 | Terry D Jewell | Carter, MT 59420 | $1,539 |
58 | Chauvet Ranch Co | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $1,479 |
59 | Walter F Robertson Estate | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $1,431 |
60 | Steven R Kelly | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $1,376 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”