Total Commodity Programs in Chouteau County, Montana, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 572
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Chouteau County, Montana totaled $5,541,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Cj Farms Inc | Highwood, MT 59450 | $34,241 |
42 | Blue Horse Inc | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $33,307 |
43 | , | $32,838 | |
44 | Sunny Brook Colony Inc | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $32,472 |
45 | D & J Robertson Farms Inc | Loma, MT 59460 | $32,174 |
46 | C D Farms Inc | Loma, MT 59460 | $31,508 |
47 | Steve Witt | Loma, MT 59460 | $30,904 |
48 | Blaine Hl Juedeman | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $30,151 |
49 | Danreuther Heritage Farms Inc | Loma, MT 59460 | $29,951 |
50 | Gasvoda & Sons Inc | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $29,855 |
51 | Ed Ventures Inc | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $29,706 |
52 | C & E Farms | Dutton, MT 59433 | $29,450 |
53 | J & C Worrall Farms Inc | Loma, MT 59460 | $29,404 |
54 | Lippert Grain & Cattle | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $29,159 |
55 | O'hara Land & Cattle | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $28,772 |
56 | Riverview Colony Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $28,061 |
57 | Bailey Land & Livestock Inc | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $27,244 |
58 | Dan Works Farms Inc | Loma, MT 59460 | $26,425 |
59 | Kerry Upham Inc | Loma, MT 59460 | $26,264 |
60 | Streit Livestock | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $26,186 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”