Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Chouteau County, Montana, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 543
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Chouteau County, Montana totaled $4,977,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | , | $18,197 | |
82 | Marias River Farms | Chester, MT 59522 | $18,100 |
83 | Easton J Enott | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $18,090 |
84 | Bahn Inc | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $17,732 |
85 | Silverado Farms II | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $16,600 |
86 | M & J Mcgowan Enterprises | Highwood, MT 59450 | $16,566 |
87 | Gasvoda & Sons Inc | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $16,373 |
88 | A And O Ag Co | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $15,808 |
89 | Crow Coulee Ranch Corp | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $15,654 |
90 | Floyd Danbrook | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $15,347 |
91 | Helen Danbrook | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $15,347 |
92 | Phil Tadej Ranch Co | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $15,074 |
93 | Briese Farms Inc | Loma, MT 59460 | $14,914 |
94 | F J Haxton Inc | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $14,787 |
95 | Rominger Farms | Floweree, MT 59440 | $14,752 |
96 | Prairie Sage Inc | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $14,644 |
97 | S & L Agri Ranch Inc | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $14,631 |
98 | Myers Farms Inc | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $14,537 |
99 | Bahnmiller Land Co | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $14,284 |
100 | K & E Brothers | Loma, MT 59460 | $14,222 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”