Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Chouteau County, Montana, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 148
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Chouteau County, Montana totaled $2,267,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Arm Grain & Cattle Co | Highwood, MT 59450 | $6,359 |
82 | David Ryffel | Highwood, MT 59450 | $6,263 |
83 | Gasvoda Brothers Livestock LLC | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $6,176 |
84 | Fredrick W Finke | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $6,122 |
85 | Ronald A Pearson | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $6,038 |
86 | Brant R Hasbrouck | Floweree, MT 59440 | $5,726 |
87 | Johnathan R Labuda | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $5,392 |
88 | Nicholas Gondeiro | Highwood, MT 59450 | $5,387 |
89 | Cutter Martin | Conrad, MT 59425 | $5,363 |
90 | Kesler Martin | Conrad, MT 59425 | $5,363 |
91 | Janet K Sheehy | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $5,045 |
92 | William F Muir | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $4,995 |
93 | Phil Tadej Ranch Co | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $4,890 |
94 | Arland W Gasvoda | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $4,871 |
95 | Twin Hills Colony Inc | Carter, MT 59420 | $4,841 |
96 | Melissa A Clark | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $4,577 |
97 | Rory Ray Clark | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $4,577 |
98 | Derek Sande | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $4,554 |
99 | Richard Leroy Ewing | Power, MT 59468 | $4,391 |
100 | , | $4,324 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”