Total Emergency Relief Program in Chouteau County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 544
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in Chouteau County, Montana totaled $22,481,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Danreuther Ag Inc | Loma, MT 59460 | $87,729 |
82 | Frank F Maxwell | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $85,091 |
83 | R W Cook & Sons Inc | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $84,995 |
84 | Timothy D Bahnmiller | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $84,688 |
85 | Prairie Breezes Inc | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $83,939 |
86 | Meadow Lane Colony Inc | Loma, MT 59460 | $83,525 |
87 | Mountain View Land And Grain Inc | Carter, MT 59420 | $81,516 |
88 | Tjbj Ranch Co | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $81,460 |
89 | D C Bahnmiller Farm Inc | Highwood, MT 59450 | $81,221 |
90 | Ty Cline Farms Inc | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $81,086 |
91 | Casey R Bailey | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $80,891 |
92 | Bryan Bailey | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $78,932 |
93 | Sande Farms LLC | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $74,552 |
94 | Boehm Land & Lvstk Inc | Rudyard, MT 59540 | $74,051 |
95 | Stone Farms Ltd | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $73,451 |
96 | D J M Farms Inc | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $73,373 |
97 | Michael D Pimperton | Carter, MT 59420 | $72,793 |
98 | Turk Lords | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $71,695 |
99 | Beau A Pegar | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $70,906 |
100 | Big Rabbit Inc | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $70,320 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”