Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in Chouteau County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 385
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in Chouteau County, Montana totaled $2,616,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Bernard J Diekhans | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $9,107 |
82 | Boehm Land & Lvstk Inc | Rudyard, MT 59540 | $9,074 |
83 | Gerald Lohse | Carter, MT 59420 | $8,756 |
84 | Rutledge Grain & Lvstk Co | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $8,712 |
85 | Joy M Trunk | Bigfork, MT 59911 | $8,587 |
86 | Christopher S Boyce | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $8,426 |
87 | Bar Mf Inc | Carter, MT 59420 | $8,306 |
88 | Ames Ranch Inc | Carter, MT 59420 | $8,306 |
89 | Kenneth R Evans | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $8,001 |
90 | Darrell C Taylor | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $7,973 |
91 | William A Meeks Jr | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $7,655 |
92 | Streit Livestock | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $7,650 |
93 | Robert B Boyce | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $7,614 |
94 | William Frances Lohse | Carter, MT 59420 | $7,580 |
95 | Malek Inc | Highwood, MT 59450 | $7,477 |
96 | Goosebill Ranch | Chester, MT 59446 | $7,391 |
97 | Hicks & Sons Inc | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $6,946 |
98 | Stephen D Grossman | Shonkin, MT 59450 | $6,679 |
99 | Bar Z Ranch Inc | Highwood, MT 59450 | $6,656 |
100 | Alan E Weaver | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $6,647 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”