Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Chouteau County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 817
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Chouteau County, Montana totaled $14,507,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | James R Steven | Chester, MT 59522 | $49,875 |
82 | Rominger Farms | Floweree, MT 59440 | $49,456 |
83 | C D Farms Inc | Loma, MT 59460 | $49,452 |
84 | W-five Ranch | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $49,383 |
85 | Drylander Farming Inc | Brady, MT 59416 | $49,039 |
86 | Duane Beirwagen Farms Inc | Loma, MT 59460 | $48,839 |
87 | Paul J & Jerri L Dostal Llp | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $48,651 |
88 | South Bench Farms LLC | Highwood, MT 59450 | $48,588 |
89 | Square Butte Farms Inc | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $48,490 |
90 | K T B Ranch Inc | Highwood, MT 59450 | $48,319 |
91 | David W Robinson | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $47,661 |
92 | Lawrence M Bold | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $47,204 |
93 | Wishman Farms Inc | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $47,120 |
94 | Terry & Rhonda Deborde Farm | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $46,882 |
95 | Little Sandy Creek Farms Inc | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $46,499 |
96 | Sternberg Farms Inc | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $46,268 |
97 | Jody Hansen Farm Inc | Rudyard, MT 59540 | $45,952 |
98 | J & A Farms Inc | Brady, MT 59416 | $45,856 |
99 | Rays-n Grain Farms Inc | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $45,583 |
100 | Circle View Farms | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $45,384 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”