Total Conservation Programs in Chouteau County, Montana, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 221
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Chouteau County, Montana totaled $1,976,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Christian H Moline | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $7,999 |
82 | Duane A Cooke | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $7,677 |
83 | Charles Worrall Farms Inc | Loma, MT 59460 | $7,429 |
84 | Leinart Family Solar Farms LLC | Lolo, MT 59847 | $7,196 |
85 | Walter Gary Robertson | Stockton-on-tees, TS19 | $7,160 |
86 | Cory Danreuther | Loma, MT 59460 | $7,050 |
87 | Triangle N Farms Inc | Bozeman, MT 59715 | $6,799 |
88 | The Qtip Trust Of Edward J Yirsa | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $6,561 |
89 | H Bar O Farms Inc | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $6,418 |
90 | Perry Joyce | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $6,235 |
91 | R Jon Tester | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $6,047 |
92 | Spring Coulee Ranch Inc | Highwood, MT 59450 | $5,971 |
93 | Evelyn P Peterson | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $5,967 |
94 | Kyle Keith Danreuther | Loma, MT 59460 | $5,929 |
95 | Jasmine Marie Danreuther | Loma, MT 59460 | $5,929 |
96 | Marcie Ann Bough | Highwood, MT 59450 | $5,869 |
97 | Lenard Jappe | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $5,824 |
98 | Harry A Bold | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $5,536 |
99 | Ed Ventures Inc | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $5,491 |
100 | Dolores Spencer | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $5,407 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”