Farm Subsidy information
Chouteau County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Chouteau County, Montana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 1,055
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Chouteau County, Montana totaled $39,034,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | E-7 Grain & Livestock Co | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $74,881 |
102 | Rays-n Grain Farms Inc | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $73,954 |
103 | J & C Worrall Farms Inc | Loma, MT 59460 | $73,356 |
104 | Bjr Farms Inc | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $73,047 |
105 | 5 K Ranch Inc | Fairfield, MT 59436 | $72,926 |
106 | Dan Works Farms Inc | Loma, MT 59460 | $72,462 |
107 | D J M Farms Inc | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $72,348 |
108 | Mountain View Land And Grain Inc | Carter, MT 59420 | $71,672 |
109 | Floyd Danbrook | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $71,573 |
110 | Kraig C Meeks | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $71,169 |
111 | Lawrence M Bold | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $70,603 |
112 | Helen Danbrook | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $70,540 |
113 | Todd Witt Farms Inc | Carter, MT 59420 | $70,036 |
114 | Beau A Pegar | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $69,456 |
115 | N Hanging 5 Ranch | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $68,893 |
116 | Circle View Farms | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $68,429 |
117 | Rocker Diamond Ranch Co | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $66,730 |
118 | Juedeman Grain Co | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $66,545 |
119 | Lefurgey Farms Inc | Loma, MT 59460 | $65,764 |
120 | Little Sandy Creek Farms Inc | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $65,434 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”