Farm Subsidy information
Chouteau County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Chouteau County, Montana, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 787
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Chouteau County, Montana totaled $35,259,000 in in 2023.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 101 | D & J Robertson Farms Inc | Loma, MT 59460 | $44,407 |
| 102 | Enigma Specialties | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $44,330 |
| 103 | Ed Ventures Inc | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $44,181 |
| 104 | Frank F Maxwell | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $44,118 |
| 105 | Double P Land LLC | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $44,002 |
| 106 | Fred F Schafer | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $42,856 |
| 107 | Gail F Schafer | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $42,854 |
| 108 | Rocker Diamond Ranch Co | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $42,144 |
| 109 | Kelly Rutledge | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $41,290 |
| 110 | Malek Angus Ranch Inc | Highwood, MT 59450 | $41,198 |
| 111 | Dan Works Farms Inc | Loma, MT 59460 | $40,585 |
| 112 | Gasvoda Brothers Livestock LLC | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $40,420 |
| 113 | Bahnmiller Land Co | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $40,152 |
| 114 | R N D Acres Inc | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $40,146 |
| 115 | Lonesome Prairie Farm Inc | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $39,923 |
| 116 | Kgb Inc | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $39,598 |
| 117 | Ralph R Seibel | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $39,157 |
| 118 | Danreuther Ag Inc | Loma, MT 59460 | $38,908 |
| 119 | , | $38,891 | |
| 120 | Big Rabbit Inc | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $38,736 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
