Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in Chouteau County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 385
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in Chouteau County, Montana totaled $2,616,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Darlington Cattle Co | Belt, MT 59412 | $6,642 |
102 | Karen C Lippert | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $6,520 |
103 | Darlington Brothers | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $6,432 |
104 | Catherine C Brewer | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $6,431 |
105 | Stewart Ranch Inc | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $6,398 |
106 | J R Ranch Inc | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $6,398 |
107 | Robert E Ebeling | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $6,358 |
108 | Phil Tadej Ranch Co | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $6,354 |
109 | Wilbur M Cavitt Jr Estate | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $6,327 |
110 | Russell P Clark | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $6,310 |
111 | K & E Brothers | Loma, MT 59460 | $5,919 |
112 | Fredrick W Finke | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $5,826 |
113 | Jody Hansen | Rudyard, MT 59540 | $5,569 |
114 | Courtnage & Sons Inc | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $5,537 |
115 | Gyme Scribner | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $5,478 |
116 | Helen Trunk | Loma, MT 59460 | $5,342 |
117 | Gorman Creek Ranch Inc | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $5,267 |
118 | Penny Meeks | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $5,262 |
119 | Genereux Farm Inc | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $5,203 |
120 | Francis Gasvoda | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $5,181 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”