Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Chouteau County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 817
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Chouteau County, Montana totaled $14,507,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Fred F Schafer | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $45,189 |
102 | Gail F Schafer | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $45,187 |
103 | Bessette Ranch Co | Loma, MT 59460 | $45,159 |
104 | Dan Works Farms Inc | Loma, MT 59460 | $45,062 |
105 | Bahnmiller Land Co | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $44,856 |
106 | North Trail Ranch Inc | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $44,705 |
107 | Pasha Brothers | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $44,498 |
108 | Floyd Danbrook | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $44,475 |
109 | Anderson Partnership | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $44,292 |
110 | M & J Mcgowan Enterprises | Highwood, MT 59450 | $44,011 |
111 | Marias River Farms | Chester, MT 59522 | $43,916 |
112 | Helen Danbrook | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $43,700 |
113 | William L Brown | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $43,658 |
114 | Beirwagen Farms | Loma, MT 59460 | $43,578 |
115 | D & L Acres Inc | Loma, MT 59460 | $43,202 |
116 | Charlson Ranch Co | Carter, MT 59420 | $43,167 |
117 | Jurenka Farms LLC | Malta, MT 59538 | $43,153 |
118 | Phillip R Hodgson | Brady, MT 59416 | $42,875 |
119 | Shirley M Kralich | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $42,361 |
120 | Bandel Farms Inc | Floweree, MT 59440 | $42,154 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”