Conservation Reserve Program in Chouteau County, Montana, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 221
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Chouteau County, Montana totaled $1,976,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Charles J Naeseth | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $3,787 |
122 | James Worrall | Loma, MT 59460 | $3,743 |
123 | Calista Worrall | Loma, MT 59460 | $3,743 |
124 | Larry E Bronec | Manhattan, MT 59741 | $3,738 |
125 | Francine Bronec | Manhattan, MT 59741 | $3,738 |
126 | Dianna Webster | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $3,710 |
127 | Walker Co Inc | Floweree, MT 59440 | $3,611 |
128 | Terry D Jewell | Carter, MT 59420 | $3,463 |
129 | H Lazy D Inc | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $3,372 |
130 | Promised Land Farm Inc | Floweree, MT 59440 | $3,338 |
131 | Sherry L Rowland | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $3,220 |
132 | Nila Ann Compton | Billings, MT 59106 | $3,213 |
133 | Greg Mecklenburg | Bozeman, MT 59718 | $3,170 |
134 | Mountain View Land And Grain Inc | Carter, MT 59420 | $3,071 |
135 | Charleen E Elliott | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $3,048 |
136 | Juanita Deck | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $3,017 |
137 | Molinario Farms | Carter, MT 59420 | $2,970 |
138 | Shirley A Yirsa | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $2,934 |
139 | Rodney Debruycker | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $2,753 |
140 | Tracy Jo Debruycker | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $2,753 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”