Total Disaster Programs in Chouteau County, Montana, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 548
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Chouteau County, Montana totaled $23,929,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Ty Cline Farms Inc | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $63,027 |
122 | Agra Reid Inc | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $62,287 |
123 | Ryan M Handley | Clinton, MT 59825 | $62,089 |
124 | Big Rabbit Inc | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $61,649 |
125 | Orville & Arlene Skogen Dba Skogen Ranch | Fort Shaw, MT 59443 | $60,948 |
126 | Pollington Inc | Havre, MT 59501 | $60,455 |
127 | Davis Ranch | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $60,422 |
128 | Prairie Sage Inc | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $59,534 |
129 | R T D Farm Inc | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $59,329 |
130 | Arland W Gasvoda | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $59,249 |
131 | D C Bahnmiller Farm Inc | Highwood, MT 59450 | $59,179 |
132 | Grant W Harrer | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $58,231 |
133 | Richard M Bailey | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $57,416 |
134 | Larry N Ophus | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $56,930 |
135 | Teton Land Co | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $56,157 |
136 | Gray's Northview Farms Inc | Highwood, MT 59450 | $55,433 |
137 | Diamond 5 Ranch Company | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $54,932 |
138 | Briese Farms Inc | Loma, MT 59460 | $54,581 |
139 | Oscar J Trunk - The Oscar & Emelie Trunk Rev Tr. | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $52,546 |
140 | D J M Farms Inc | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $52,408 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”