Farm Subsidy information
Chouteau County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Chouteau County, Montana, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 787
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Chouteau County, Montana totaled $35,259,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Robertson Ranch Co Inc | Carter, MT 59420 | $33,193 |
142 | Cm Farms Inc | Loma, MT 59460 | $32,777 |
143 | Sunny Brook Colony Inc | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $32,472 |
144 | Kenneth R Ritland | Loma, MT 59460 | $32,188 |
145 | Kalanick Ranch Inc | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $31,886 |
146 | Brant R Hasbrouck | Floweree, MT 59440 | $30,662 |
147 | Robert E Spevacek | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $30,557 |
148 | Crooked Furrow Inc | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $30,265 |
149 | E & M Farms Inc | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $30,202 |
150 | Arm Grain & Cattle Co | Highwood, MT 59450 | $29,877 |
151 | William E Spevacek | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $29,663 |
152 | C & E Farms | Dutton, MT 59433 | $29,450 |
153 | Silverado Farms II | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $29,228 |
154 | Meadow Lane Colony Inc | Loma, MT 59460 | $28,862 |
155 | North Trail Ranch Inc | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $28,675 |
156 | Riverview Colony Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $28,061 |
157 | Ty Cline Farms Inc | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $27,885 |
158 | Rose E Goldhahn | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $27,830 |
159 | Scribner Ranch Inc | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $27,475 |
160 | Lone Tree Cattle Co Inc | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $27,468 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”