Market Gains in Chouteau County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 260
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Chouteau County, Montana totaled $1,417,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Harold H Goldhahn Jr | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $2,360 |
142 | Keith D Brodock | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $2,325 |
143 | Marlene R Killion | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $2,320 |
144 | Hettrick Family Trust | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $2,276 |
145 | Noah Martinez | Somers, MT 59932 | $2,231 |
146 | Triple E Inc | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $2,210 |
147 | John M Pavlovick Jr | Havre, MT 59501 | $2,205 |
148 | Brian T Dyer | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $2,184 |
149 | Lawrence M Bold | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $2,130 |
150 | Ronald L Robison | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $2,127 |
151 | Molin Co | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $2,100 |
152 | Rainbow Ranch Partnership | Oxnard, CA 93035 | $2,019 |
153 | Vau Inc | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $1,985 |
154 | Glen A Kulbeck | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $1,891 |
155 | Vernon E Woods | Brady, MT 59416 | $1,887 |
156 | Larry A Myers | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $1,880 |
157 | Cactus Rose Farms Inc | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $1,844 |
158 | D Jack Willson | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $1,770 |
159 | Michael D Pimperton | Carter, MT 59420 | $1,762 |
160 | Gorman Creek Ranch Inc | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $1,758 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”