Hard Winter Wheat Incentive Program in Chouteau County, Montana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 64
Recipients of Hard Winter Wheat Incentive Program from farms in Chouteau County, Montana totaled $257,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Hard Winter Wheat Incentive Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Carl Grossman | Shonkin, MT 59450 | $4,778 |
22 | Mountain View Land And Grain Inc | Carter, MT 59420 | $3,992 |
23 | Streit Livestock | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $3,780 |
24 | Pna Inc | Highwood, MT 59450 | $2,995 |
25 | Bahn Inc | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $2,970 |
26 | Gray's Northview Farms Inc | Highwood, MT 59450 | $2,818 |
27 | Agra Reid Inc | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $2,729 |
28 | Missouri Breaks Ranch Inc | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $2,523 |
29 | Bud G Knutson | Kingman, AZ 86401 | $2,475 |
30 | Spurgeon Family Ltd Partnership | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $2,395 |
31 | Engellant Ranch Partnership | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $2,319 |
32 | Dusty Acre Farms Inc | Loma, MT 59460 | $2,305 |
33 | Jon H Evers | Shonkin, MT 59450 | $2,290 |
34 | Lenington Farms | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $2,266 |
35 | Crooked Furrow Inc | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $2,265 |
36 | Neil L Hildebrand Irrevocable Trust | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $2,130 |
37 | Big View Ranch | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $1,651 |
38 | Maughan Farms Inc | Hysham, MT 59038 | $1,588 |
39 | Jeannine E Bartholomew | Mesa, AZ 85206 | $1,382 |
40 | Neil Hildebrand Gift Trust | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $1,209 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”