Total Disaster Programs in Chouteau County, Montana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,697
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Chouteau County, Montana totaled $61,138,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Frank F Maxwell | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $285,548 |
22 | Long's Farm And Seed Inc | Shonkin, MT 59450 | $281,659 |
23 | Worrall Brothers Farm Partnership | Loma, MT 59460 | $280,254 |
24 | Lonewillow Ranch Inc | Bigfork, MT 59911 | $276,071 |
25 | Hillview Farm Inc | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $275,377 |
26 | B & M Lund | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $274,618 |
27 | Bailey Land & Livestock Inc | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $271,756 |
28 | Sunny Brook Colony Inc | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $269,745 |
29 | Donald Gondeiro Jr | Highwood, MT 59450 | $249,982 |
30 | Russ Knudson | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $236,077 |
31 | Missouri Breaks Ranch Inc | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $233,487 |
32 | K & E Brothers | Loma, MT 59460 | $232,828 |
33 | Lis B Maxwell | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $232,811 |
34 | Schipf - Swan Ranch Inc | Highwood, MT 59450 | $232,550 |
35 | Lms Grain Inc | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $232,378 |
36 | Andreasen Lenington Partnership | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $231,227 |
37 | Daka Farms | Carter, MT 59420 | $229,306 |
38 | Silverado Farms II | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $224,387 |
39 | Drylander Farming | Brady, MT 59416 | $223,233 |
40 | Harris Land & Cattle | Highwood, MT 59450 | $223,120 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”