Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Custer County, Montana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 223
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Custer County, Montana totaled $1,469,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Clark Cameron | Terry, MT 59349 | $17,094 |
22 | Hat LLC | Miles City, MT 59301 | $16,644 |
23 | Charles B Moore | Miles City, MT 59301 | $16,470 |
24 | Thomas S Ostendorf | Powderville, MT 59345 | $16,424 |
25 | Ward Weidenbach | Miles City, MT 59301 | $15,623 |
26 | Balsam Inc | Miles City, MT 59301 | $15,553 |
27 | Michael Haughian | Miles City, MT 59301 | $15,384 |
28 | Jay F Murnion | Miles City, MT 59301 | $14,119 |
29 | Vision Enterprises LLC | Miles City, MT 59301 | $13,778 |
30 | Murray Cattle Llp | Miles City, MT 59301 | $13,766 |
31 | Mallett Cattle Co | Powderville, MT 59345 | $13,736 |
32 | Dru Burk | Ismay, MT 59336 | $13,393 |
33 | Charles D Cavill | Ismay, MT 59336 | $13,361 |
34 | Willow Creek Cattle Co LLC | Miles City, MT 59301 | $13,177 |
35 | Erik Carl Peterson | Miles City, MT 59301 | $12,993 |
36 | Elk State Bank ** | Circle, MT 59215 | $12,726 |
37 | John Henry Beardsley | Miles City, MT 59301 | $12,610 |
38 | Alyn Haughian | Kinsey, MT 59338 | $12,492 |
39 | B B & H Ranch Company | Miles City, MT 59301 | $12,401 |
40 | Richard W Gray | Ismay, MT 59336 | $12,328 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”