Farm Subsidy information
Custer County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Custer County, Montana, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 178
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Custer County, Montana totaled $4,442,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Willow Creek Cattle Co LLC | Miles City, MT 59301 | $44,119 |
22 | Vermilion Ranch | Terry, MT 59349 | $42,464 |
23 | Mcnamee Angus Ranch Lp | Miles City, MT 59301 | $41,743 |
24 | Scot K Robinson | Powderville, MT 59345 | $40,762 |
25 | Cassandra Lee Erickson | Ismay, MT 59336 | $40,288 |
26 | Milliron Triangle Cattle | Miles City, MT 59301 | $38,446 |
27 | John Henry Beardsley | Miles City, MT 59301 | $38,338 |
28 | Jason D Bollinger | Jordan, MT 59337 | $36,848 |
29 | John A Beardsley | Miles City, MT 59301 | $34,649 |
30 | , | $30,705 | |
31 | David H Branger Etal Ptr - Top Hat Livestock | Miles City, MT 59301 | $30,154 |
32 | L J Green & Sons | Volborg, MT 59351 | $30,118 |
33 | Roger Donsbach | Miles City, MT 59301 | $29,917 |
34 | Dru Burk | Ismay, MT 59336 | $28,711 |
35 | Larry E Mcgill Jr | Miles City, MT 59301 | $26,401 |
36 | Murray Cattle Llp | Miles City, MT 59301 | $25,857 |
37 | Michael Haughian | Miles City, MT 59301 | $25,684 |
38 | Kyle Shaw | Miles City, MT 59301 | $25,328 |
39 | Clinton Stinson | Miles City, MT 59301 | $23,904 |
40 | Mallett Cattle Co | Powderville, MT 59345 | $22,932 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”