Wool and Mohair Programs in Custer County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 72
Recipients of Wool and Mohair Programs from farms in Custer County, Montana totaled $182,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Wool and Mohair Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Mark J Paulson | Miles City, MT 59301 | $1,903 |
22 | John M Weist | Miles City, MT 59301 | $1,644 |
23 | Robert A Hagemeister | Kinsey, MT 59338 | $1,544 |
24 | Daniel D Doran | Miles City, MT 59301 | $1,500 |
25 | Timothy C Steadman | Miles City, MT 59301 | $1,489 |
26 | Willis Aye | Miles City, MT 59301 | $1,480 |
27 | Pat Anderson | Kinsey, MT 59338 | $1,442 |
28 | Debra L Bartholomew | Miles City, MT 59301 | $1,415 |
29 | Irene Reed | Miles City, MT 59301 | $1,318 |
30 | Darrell L Harding | Miles City, MT 59301 | $1,313 |
31 | Edmund Heinle | Miles City, MT 59301 | $1,291 |
32 | Don Muri | Miles City, MT 59301 | $1,269 |
33 | Raymond Roesler | Miles City, MT 59301 | $1,247 |
34 | Philip Leidholt Inc | Miles City, MT 59301 | $1,157 |
35 | Emily Madsen | Volborg, MT 59351 | $1,107 |
36 | Raymond P Rath | Miles City, MT 59301 | $1,003 |
37 | Ralph Scheeler | Miles City, MT 59301 | $872 |
38 | Jake Flanigan | Miles City, MT 59301 | $831 |
39 | John Klamm | Miles City, MT 59301 | $793 |
40 | Robert Riley | Billings, MT 59102 | $782 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”