Deficiency Payment in Custer County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 159
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Custer County, Montana totaled $245,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Wade O Olson | Miles City, MT 59301 | $605 |
82 | Kenneth Younglund | Miles City, MT 59301 | $586 |
83 | Michael B Toennis | Miles City, MT 59301 | $573 |
84 | Marvin Wallace | Terry, MT 59349 | $571 |
85 | Harold Wallace | Terry, MT 59349 | $571 |
86 | John F Doran | Miles City, MT 59301 | $554 |
87 | Christian J Lund Trust | Miles City, MT 59301 | $546 |
88 | Michael C Swope | Miles City, MT 59301 | $536 |
89 | Dnrc Trust Land Management - Exem | Helena, MT 59620 | $525 |
90 | Jerome E Hansen | Miles City, MT 59301 | $520 |
91 | James May | Ismay, MT 59336 | $517 |
92 | Harding Land & Cattle Co Inc | Terry, MT 59349 | $497 |
93 | Rodney Kelly | Ismay, MT 59336 | $494 |
94 | Tongue River Ranch Company | Miles City, MT 59301 | $490 |
95 | J Deibel Wheat & Cattle | Miles City, MT 59301 | $479 |
96 | J L Bloom | Miles City, MT 59301 | $478 |
97 | Alasdair Cameron | Miles City, MT 59301 | $439 |
98 | Ejner Hansen | Kinsey, MT 59338 | $425 |
99 | Michael F Lamendola | Kinsey, MT 59338 | $420 |
100 | Ernest W Peterson | Miles City, MT 59301 | $411 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”