Farm Subsidy information
Custer County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Custer County, Montana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 293
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Custer County, Montana totaled $7,702,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Nancy Lee Ayers | Ismay, MT 59336 | $18,906 |
102 | Kerry S Erickson | Ismay, MT 59336 | $17,131 |
103 | Taylor Beardsley | Miles City, MT 59301 | $16,912 |
104 | Hat LLC | Miles City, MT 59301 | $16,644 |
105 | Linda Moore | Miles City, MT 59301 | $16,431 |
106 | Ward Weidenbach | Miles City, MT 59301 | $15,623 |
107 | Bart Meged | Miles City, MT 59301 | $15,522 |
108 | Terry Lee Hoenke | Ismay, MT 59336 | $15,328 |
109 | Michael W Melin | Miles City, MT 59301 | $15,064 |
110 | Kreston C Brookman | Molt, MT 59057 | $14,838 |
111 | Cottonwood Creek Cattle LLC | Miles City, MT 59301 | $14,238 |
112 | B B & H Ranch Company | Miles City, MT 59301 | $14,219 |
113 | Logan John Eayrs | Ismay, MT 59336 | $13,966 |
114 | Cap Rock Ranch Inc | Miles City, MT 59301 | $13,938 |
115 | James Stacy Anderson | Ismay, MT 59336 | $13,872 |
116 | Frederick Zook | Miles City, MT 59301 | $13,445 |
117 | Hugo Muggli Inc | Miles City, MT 59301 | $13,189 |
118 | Jeffrey Allen Cahill | Miles City, MT 59301 | $12,866 |
119 | L Bar W Ranch Inc | Volborg, MT 59351 | $12,797 |
120 | Elk State Bank ** | Circle, MT 59215 | $12,726 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”