Loan Deficiency in Custer County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 184
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Custer County, Montana totaled $1,852,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Roger O Geving | Plevna, MT 59344 | $314 |
162 | Dana Lynn Penrod | Miles City, MT 59301 | $292 |
163 | Erik Carl Peterson | Miles City, MT 59301 | $283 |
164 | The 96 Ranch LLC | Polson, MT 59860 | $259 |
165 | David A Hauk | Miles City, MT 59301 | $244 |
166 | Elsie Wolff Revocable Trust | Miles City, MT 59301 | $242 |
167 | Lori Meidinger | Miles City, MT 59301 | $175 |
168 | A E Hedstrom Inc | Miles City, MT 59301 | $166 |
169 | Raymond Roesler | Miles City, MT 59301 | $162 |
170 | James Mount | Miles City, MT 59301 | $158 |
171 | Rickie A Abbott | Miles City, MT 59301 | $150 |
172 | Jane Bundy | Miles City, MT 59301 | $140 |
173 | Donald Leroy Johnstone | Powderville, MT 59345 | $120 |
174 | Alan Brown | Kinsey, MT 59338 | $111 |
175 | Gary Lapp | Terry, MT 59349 | $96 |
176 | Duane Lapp | Terry, MT 59349 | $96 |
177 | Jennifer Lea Bice Peterson | Miles City, MT 59301 | $84 |
178 | Edythe M Hardy | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $70 |
179 | Tracey Krutzfeldt | Powderville, MT 59345 | $67 |
180 | Dept Of Natural Resources & Conservation Trust Lan | Helena, MT 59620 | $54 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”