Non-insured Disaster Assistance in Custer County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 227
Recipients of Non-insured Disaster Assistance from farms in Custer County, Montana totaled $13,568,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Non-insured Disaster Assistance 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Phalen Ranch Co | Ismay, MT 59336 | $561,248 |
2 | Innovative Farms | Miles City, MT 59301 | $437,130 |
3 | Griffin Ranch Co | Ismay, MT 59336 | $391,799 |
4 | Susan H Peila | Shepherd, MT 59079 | $347,389 |
5 | Deadman Ranch LLC | Miles City, MT 59301 | $344,292 |
6 | Diamond J Cattle LLC | Miles City, MT 59301 | $296,578 |
7 | Charles D Cavill | Ismay, MT 59336 | $271,140 |
8 | Lewis John Krutzfeldt | Powderville, MT 59345 | $261,114 |
9 | Michael Haughian | Miles City, MT 59301 | $251,279 |
10 | Karen Krutzfeldt | Powderville, MT 59345 | $247,379 |
11 | Keystone Ranches Inc | Ismay, MT 59336 | $246,007 |
12 | Mallett Cattle Co | Powderville, MT 59345 | $240,689 |
13 | Jeffrey C Peila | Shepherd, MT 59079 | $228,821 |
14 | Balsam Inc | Miles City, MT 59301 | $223,177 |
15 | John A Beardsley | Miles City, MT 59301 | $216,456 |
16 | Cecil Brown Ranch Co | Ismay, MT 59336 | $210,832 |
17 | B B & H Ranch Company | Miles City, MT 59301 | $208,327 |
18 | Michael David Ballensky | Miles City, MT 59301 | $203,509 |
19 | Douglas D Singleton | Mildred, MT 59341 | $199,408 |
20 | Haughian Livestock Co | Kinsey, MT 59338 | $193,017 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>