Farm Subsidy information
Custer County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Custer County, Montana, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 170
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Custer County, Montana totaled $2,314,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Stockman Bank ** | Conrad, MT 59425 | $28,975 |
| 22 | Steadman's Ranch & Properties LLC | Miles City, MT 59301 | $26,075 |
| 23 | Swope Ranch LLC | Miles City, MT 59301 | $23,326 |
| 24 | Daniel D Doran | Miles City, MT 59301 | $19,263 |
| 25 | Timothy C Steadman | Miles City, MT 59301 | $18,318 |
| 26 | Thomas S Ostendorf | Powderville, MT 59345 | $17,068 |
| 27 | Deadman Ranch LLC | Miles City, MT 59301 | $16,788 |
| 28 | Leland Ranch Inc | Ismay, MT 59336 | $16,574 |
| 29 | Willow Creek Cattle Co LLC | Miles City, MT 59301 | $16,557 |
| 30 | Lewis John Krutzfeldt | Powderville, MT 59345 | $16,373 |
| 31 | Karen Krutzfeldt | Powderville, MT 59345 | $16,373 |
| 32 | Damian Joe Ballensky | Miles City, MT 59301 | $15,152 |
| 33 | Ddrtv Inc | Ismay, MT 59336 | $14,869 |
| 34 | Cap Rock Ranch Inc | Miles City, MT 59301 | $12,924 |
| 35 | Charles B Moore | Miles City, MT 59301 | $12,643 |
| 36 | William C Jones | Miles City, MT 59301 | $12,390 |
| 37 | William L Janssen | Volborg, MT 59351 | $12,156 |
| 38 | Hofmann Ranch Inc | Ismay, MT 59336 | $12,136 |
| 39 | Brent E Clark | Volborg, MT 59351 | $12,119 |
| 40 | Breanna Harbaugh | Miles City, MT 59301 | $11,896 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf