Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Daniels County, Montana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 244
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Daniels County, Montana totaled $4,001,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Rory Linder | Flaxville, MT 59222 | $5,505 |
102 | Thomas Loftsgaard | Peerless, MT 59253 | $5,459 |
103 | Grant A Edwards | Flaxville, MT 59222 | $5,399 |
104 | Scott E Susag Dba Susag Farms | Scobey, MT 59263 | $5,239 |
105 | Bonnie Summers | Flaxville, MT 59222 | $5,194 |
106 | Jerry H Baracker Living Trust | Whitefish, MT 59937 | $4,866 |
107 | King-dickson Farms Inc | Grand Junction, CO 81501 | $4,744 |
108 | Raymond Garberg | Flaxville, MT 59222 | $4,697 |
109 | Colleen Handy-colleen R Handy Rev. Trust | Flaxville, MT 59222 | $4,546 |
110 | Carol Jean Fladager | Peerless, MT 59253 | $4,397 |
111 | Teri R Hanson | Somers, MT 59932 | $4,374 |
112 | Lee Cook | Flaxville, MT 59222 | $4,358 |
113 | Cantrell Farms Inc | Whitetail, MT 59276 | $3,994 |
114 | Jeffrey E Bjarko | Scobey, MT 59263 | $3,953 |
115 | Chad Fishell | Scobey, MT 59263 | $3,942 |
116 | Harlan Gerardy | Gruver, TX 79040 | $3,927 |
117 | Curtis Fladager | Peerless, MT 59253 | $3,910 |
118 | Daryl Fladager | Peerless, MT 59253 | $3,842 |
119 | Jerry E Turner | Flaxville, MT 59222 | $3,667 |
120 | Gary Danelson | Scobey, MT 59263 | $3,662 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”