Farm Subsidy information
Daniels County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Daniels County, Montana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 415
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Daniels County, Montana totaled $26,480,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Michael D Forest | Peerless, MT 59253 | $30,593 |
142 | Kevin Jensen Farms LLC | Scobey, MT 59263 | $30,367 |
143 | Dave Hanrahan | Scobey, MT 59263 | $30,015 |
144 | Harry Myhre- Harry L Myhre And Audrey E Myhre Revo | Plentywood, MT 59254 | $29,490 |
145 | Theresia Gilchrist | Whitefish, MT 59937 | $29,242 |
146 | James L Hammar | Scobey, MT 59263 | $29,097 |
147 | Crandell Farms LLC | Scobey, MT 59263 | $27,708 |
148 | Larry J Donohue | Scobey, MT 59263 | $26,952 |
149 | Marlenee Farm & Ranch Inc | Laurel, MT 59044 | $26,924 |
150 | Daryl Fladager | Peerless, MT 59253 | $26,769 |
151 | Tim Lundquist | Flaxville, MT 59222 | $26,694 |
152 | Martin Caracciolo-rojas | Scobey, MT 59263 | $26,355 |
153 | Lazy Ak Farms Inc | Redstone, MT 59257 | $25,870 |
154 | Laura J Kasseth-king | Helena, MT 59602 | $25,367 |
155 | Terry L Mohn | Flaxville, MT 59222 | $25,193 |
156 | Dori Carney | Scobey, MT 59263 | $25,021 |
157 | Ernest Myhre | Flaxville, MT 59222 | $25,000 |
158 | Jd & Sibyl Hughes Rev Trust | Whitefish, MT 59937 | $24,920 |
159 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $24,826 |
160 | Gary Semple | Flaxville, MT 59222 | $24,439 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”