Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Dawson County, Montana, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 236
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Dawson County, Montana totaled $3,586,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Reilly Ranch LLC | Stanford, MT 59479 | $10,523 |
102 | Kenneth Liles Inc | Lindsay, MT 59339 | $10,208 |
103 | Gary D Engle | Glendive, MT 59330 | $10,031 |
104 | Diede Partnership | Savage, MT 59262 | $9,925 |
105 | Gibson Farms Inc | Lindsay, MT 59339 | $9,701 |
106 | Paul Diegel | Valley City, ND 58072 | $9,682 |
107 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $9,650 |
108 | Edwards Livestock LLC | Lindsay, MT 59339 | $9,596 |
109 | Karen R Trotter | Richey, MT 59259 | $9,581 |
110 | Benjamin Rahr | Glendive, MT 59330 | $8,898 |
111 | Perry Nentwig | Glendive, MT 59330 | $8,571 |
112 | P X Ranch Inc | Glendive, MT 59330 | $8,557 |
113 | Douglas D Unruh | Bloomfield, MT 59315 | $8,363 |
114 | Poppe Livestock LLC | Fallon, MT 59326 | $8,348 |
115 | Broken Spoke Ranch 1 Inc | Glendive, MT 59330 | $8,348 |
116 | V S Inc | Sidney, MT 59270 | $8,246 |
117 | Kimball Brost | Richey, MT 59259 | $8,208 |
118 | Agnes Sullivan | Richey, MT 59259 | $8,107 |
119 | Scott Fornall | Glendive, MT 59330 | $8,069 |
120 | Ronald Stroh - Ron & Connie Stroh Rev Tst | Glendive, MT 59330 | $7,919 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”