Total Conservation Programs in Dawson County, Montana, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 124
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Dawson County, Montana totaled $1,328,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Brenda Kartevold | Glendive, MT 59330 | $22,136 |
22 | Bennett Farms Inc | Glendive, MT 59330 | $19,702 |
23 | Amber L Hrubes | Glendive, MT 59330 | $19,694 |
24 | Jerald Tillman | Bloomfield, MT 59315 | $17,889 |
25 | Spencer Inc | Casper, WY 82609 | $17,583 |
26 | Quammen Farms Inc | Spokane, WA 99203 | $17,064 |
27 | Jensen Bros Of Circle Inc | Circle, MT 59215 | $16,602 |
28 | Robert E Olson | Richey, MT 59259 | $16,117 |
29 | Jonas Ranch Inc | Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 | $15,216 |
30 | Dmw Farms Inc | Glendive, MT 59330 | $15,193 |
31 | James Deckert | Richey, MT 59259 | $14,966 |
32 | Kenneth Liles Inc | Lindsay, MT 59339 | $14,268 |
33 | Minde-properties Inc | Sullivan, WI 53178 | $12,986 |
34 | Ms Guelff Farms Inc | Glendive, MT 59330 | $12,960 |
35 | Downs Inc | Lindsay, MT 59339 | $12,725 |
36 | 3 L Ranch Inc | Canyon, TX 79015 | $12,650 |
37 | Djm Inc | Paoli, IN 47454 | $12,540 |
38 | Stone Ranch Inc | Red Lodge, MT 59068 | $12,071 |
39 | Richard J Tieszen | Richey, MT 59259 | $11,717 |
40 | Estate Of Suzanne Ring | Maple Valley, WA 98038 | $11,516 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”