Total Commodity Programs in Fergus County, Montana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,899
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Fergus County, Montana totaled $163,917,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Deerfield Hutterian Brethren Inc | Lewistown, MT 59457 | $3,198,869 |
2 | Knerr Ranch | Roy, MT 59471 | $1,802,317 |
3 | Spring Creek Hutterian Bretheren, Inc | Lewistown, MT 59457 | $1,771,045 |
4 | Poser Brothers Llp | Denton, MT 59430 | $1,399,675 |
5 | Paul A Tyler | Moore, MT 59464 | $1,320,274 |
6 | King Ranch Hutterian Brethern Inc | Lewistown, MT 59457 | $1,319,192 |
7 | Ayers Spring Coulee Ranch | Denton, MT 59430 | $1,274,743 |
8 | B Bar M Inc | Lewistown, MT 59457 | $1,174,329 |
9 | Vincent Ployhar | Denton, MT 59430 | $1,169,808 |
10 | Curt Hartman | Lewistown, MT 59457 | $1,077,766 |
11 | Slivka Grain | Winifred, MT 59489 | $1,049,042 |
12 | Gary W Heilig | Moore, MT 59464 | $1,036,098 |
13 | Koly Hertel | Moore, MT 59464 | $1,029,826 |
14 | Helen M Heilig | Moore, MT 59464 | $1,029,160 |
15 | Weinheimer Ranch Inc | Moore, MT 59464 | $1,026,766 |
16 | Fords Creek Colony | Grass Range, MT 59032 | $1,017,780 |
17 | Robert Sawyer | Hilger, MT 59451 | $1,009,537 |
18 | Bruce Udelhoven | Winifred, MT 59489 | $990,598 |
19 | Jacqueline M Grimsrud | Roy, MT 59471 | $986,920 |
20 | Keith Weinheimer | Moore, MT 59464 | $983,519 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>