Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Flathead County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 162
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Flathead County, Montana totaled $1,866,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Robert Altenburg | Kalispell, MT 59901 | $25,881 |
22 | Great Northern Honey Co | Whitefish, MT 59937 | $23,093 |
23 | Dale Orem | Columbia Falls, MT 59912 | $21,061 |
24 | Gary Veigel | Kalispell, MT 59901 | $21,015 |
25 | Walters Cvo Inc | Kalispell, MT 59901 | $20,722 |
26 | Mclaury Apiaries Inc | Libby, MT 59923 | $20,017 |
27 | Walters Cvo Inc | Kalispell, MT 59901 | $19,585 |
28 | Kevin Hooley | Columbia Falls, MT 59912 | $19,407 |
29 | , | $18,182 | |
30 | Wicked Good Produce LLC | Whitefish, MT 59937 | $17,416 |
31 | Leon Barlow Connelly | Kalispell, MT 59901 | $16,154 |
32 | Jessica Krueger | Kalispell, MT 59901 | $15,864 |
33 | Robert N Danford | Kalispell, MT 59901 | $15,851 |
34 | Mike Manning | Kalispell, MT 59901 | $15,522 |
35 | Charles L Jaquette | Kalispell, MT 59901 | $14,483 |
36 | M & H Farming LLC | Kalispell, MT 59901 | $14,149 |
37 | Norman Baldwin | Kalispell, MT 59901 | $13,391 |
38 | Kenneth W Smith Sr | Kalispell, MT 59901 | $11,049 |
39 | Two Bear Farm LLC | Whitefish, MT 59937 | $11,033 |
40 | Judy A Owsowitz | Whitefish, MT 59937 | $10,149 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”