Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Gallatin County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 160
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Gallatin County, Montana totaled $4,932,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Trb Dykema LLC | Manhattan, MT 59741 | $53,737 |
22 | Ferguson Cattle - Intermountain LLC | Bozeman, MT 59772 | $47,687 |
23 | Green Mountain Red Angus Inc | Three Forks, MT 59752 | $43,622 |
24 | Donald Westra | Bozeman, MT 59718 | $38,839 |
25 | Lee T Van Dyke | Manhattan, MT 59741 | $38,820 |
26 | Dyk & Sons Ld & Ctl | Manhattan, MT 59741 | $38,415 |
27 | Kent Heidema | Manhattan, MT 59741 | $38,145 |
28 | Lane Cattle Company | Bozeman, MT 59715 | $37,959 |
29 | Zade S Morgan | Belgrade, MT 59714 | $37,940 |
30 | Steve J Wyse | Manhattan, MT 59741 | $37,152 |
31 | A Lyle Woosley | Wilsall, MT 59086 | $36,530 |
32 | Camp Creek Land & Cattle Co | Manhattan, MT 59741 | $35,749 |
33 | Chuck Feddes Ranch Inc | Manhattan, MT 59741 | $35,034 |
34 | William Tatarka | Bozeman, MT 59718 | $34,159 |
35 | Kimm Angus LLC | Manhattan, MT 59741 | $33,231 |
36 | 77 Ranch Corporation | Three Forks, MT 59752 | $32,041 |
37 | Feddes Herefords Inc | Manhattan, MT 59741 | $30,892 |
38 | Dykema Livestock | Manhattan, MT 59741 | $30,515 |
39 | Kent Herbert Mueller | Manhattan, MT 59741 | $29,447 |
40 | Chrism Cattle Company | Belgrade, MT 59714 | $27,780 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”